Skip to main content

Table 2 Utilities of applicant’s characteristics for project management position: odds ratios of the alternative-specific conditional choice model

From: Advanced further training or dual higher education study: a choice experiment on the influence of employers’ preferences on career advancement

Explaining variables

Odds ratio

Applicant’s characteristics (first alternative)

 Qualification of applicant (ref.: advanced training)

  Bachelor‘s degree (training-integrated)

0.854

  Bachelor‘s degree (practice-integrated)

0.878

 Place of training applicant (ref.: own establishment)

  External establishment

0.89

 Final mark applicant (ref.: very good)

  Satisfactory

0.653***

 Occupational experience applicant (ref.: none)

  2 years in external establishment

1.239 + 

  2 years in own establishment

1.550***

 Occupational specialisation of applicant (ref.: matches partly)

  Matches fully

1.084

 Alternatives (ref.: first applicant)

  Second applicant

0.395*

  Third applicant

0.785

  None of the applicants

0.000***

Interaction effects with other alternatives

 Applicant X severity of the job decision (ref: “partly, partly”)

  Second applicant X “easy”

0.633*

  Second applicant X “difficult”

0.839

  Third applicant X “easy”

0.584*

  Third applicant X “difficult”

0.815

  None of the applicants X “easy”

0.891

  None of the applicants X “difficult”

0.291

 Applicant X description of the persons (ref: “sufficient”)

  Second applicant X “too specific”

2.002 + 

  Second applicant X “too non-specific”

1.795

  Third applicant X “too specific”

1.001

  Third applicant X “too non-specific”

0.91

  None of the applicants X “too specific”

872,677.7***

  None of the applicants X “too non-specific”

1,259,874.3***

 Applicant X task area (ref: technical area)

  Second applicant X commercial area

0.812

  Second applicant X technical and commercial area

0.687

  Second applicant X other area

0.929

  Third applicant X commercial area

0.92

  Third applicant X technical and commercial area

1.136

  Third applicant X other area

1.37

  None of the applicants X commercial area

0.296*

  None of the applicants X technical and commercial area

0.472

  None of the applicants X other area

0.000***

 Applicants X training strategy (ref: bachelor in dual studies)

  Second applicant X advanced further training only

1.585*

  Second applicant X neither

1.739*

  Third applicant X advanced further training only

1.077

  Third applicant X neither

1.152

  None of the applicants X advanced further training only

0.844

  None of the applicants X neither

2.13

 Applicants X no. choice set (ref.: first)

  Second applicant X second choice set

1.305

  Second applicant X third choice set

1.39

  Third applicant X second choice set

1.169

  Third applicant X third choice set

1.349

  None of the applicants X second choice set

1.357

  None of the applicants X third choice set

1.329

  N

3159

  AIC

1938.81

  LL

− 926.405

  1. RCS 40 (2017). Establishments with missing values on the displayed variables excluded. Own calculations. Standard errors adjusted for 265 clusters (establishments)
  2.  + p < 0.10, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001