Skip to main content

Table 1 Country-level estimates of the effects of the displayed variables on the risks of exiting unemployment and of entering unemployment in a seemingly unrelated regressions setup à la Zellner (1962)

From: A cross-country study of skills and unemployment flows

 

SUR

GMM

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

 

\(\lambda _i\) (log-risk of exiting unemployment)

Numeracy (std)

\({0}.{777}^{***}\)

\({0}.{766}^{**}\)

\({0}.{849}^{***}\)

\({0}.{777}^{***}\)

\({1}.{018}^{***}\)

\({0}.{807}^{**}\)

0.281

 

(0.297)

(0.312)

(0.318)

(0.288)

(0.296)

(0.385)

(0.711)

Logarithmized GDP per capita (PPP)

\({0}.{507}^{*}\)

\({0}.{614}^{*}\)

0.540

0.356

  

(0.306)

  

(0.315)

(0.329)

(0.413)

Employment in public sector (share)

− 0.920

\({-2}.{137}^{**}\)

\({-2}.{227}^{**}\)

\({-2}.{451}^{**}\)

  

(0.912)

  

(1.090)

(1.105)

(1.238)

ICT in the workplace (std)

− 0.180

− 0.164

− 0.012

0.365

  

(0.394)

  

(0.456)

(0.492)

(0.679)

Minimum relative to median wage

− 0.586

0.397

0.168

− 0.400

   

(1.038)

 

(0.945)

(0.989)

(1.250)

Trade union density

− 0.163

− 0.101

− 0.066

0.020

   

(0.443)

 

(0.441)

(0.446)

(0.499)

Unemployment benefits (level)

\({0}.{883}^{*}\)

\({0}.{965}^{*}\)

\({1}.{038}^{*}\)

\({1}.{219}^{*}\)

    

(0.490)

(0.552)

(0.564)

(0.650)

Unemployment benefits (degression)

0.129

0.228

0.114

− 0.168

    

(0.342)

(0.383)

(0.408)

(0.543)

Employment protection (regular)

− 0.179

\({- 0}.{220}^{**}\)

− 0.189

− 0.113

    

(0.117)

(0.111)

(0.117)

(0.153)

Employment protection (temporary)

− 0.065

− 0.007

− 0.013

− 0.027

    

(0.072)

(0.073)

(0.074)

(0.083)

Instrument for numeracy

numeracy

PISA

      

ages 16–19

math

\(R^2\, (\lambda _0^c)\)

0.246

0.366

0.279

0.514

0.667

0.660

0.590

Observations

30

30

29

27

27

27

27

 

\(\delta _i\) (log-risk of entering unemployment)

Numeracy (std)

\({-1}.{193}^{***}\)

\({- 0}.{982}^{***}\)

\({-1}.{321}^{***}\)

\({-1}.{224}^{***}\)

\({-1}.{231}^{***}\)

\({-1}.{575}^{***}\)

\({-2}.{144}^{**}\)

 

(0.317)

(0.336)

(0.340)

(0.382)

(0.389)

(0.509)

(0.926)

Logarithmized GDP per capita (PPP)

0.076

− 0.203

− 0.323

− 0.521

  

(0.329)

  

(0.414)

(0.434)

(0.537)

Employment in public sector (share)

0.883

1.755

1.608

1.367

  

(0.983)

  

(1.433)

(1.460)

(1.611)

ICT in the workplace (std)

− 0.620

\({-1}.{205}^{**}\)

− 0.958

− 0.550

  

(0.424)

  

(0.600)

(0.650)

(0.883)

Minimum relative to median wage

−1.455

\({-2}.{671}^{**}\)

\({-3}.{042}^{**}\)

\({-3}.{657}^{**}\)

   

(1.112)

 

(1.242)

(1.307)

(1.626)

Trade union density

0.528

− 0.317

− 0.260

− 0.167

   

(0.474)

 

(0.579)

(0.590)

(0.650)

Unemployment benefits (level)

0.450

\({1}.{560}^{**}\)

\({1}.{678}^{**}\)

\({1}.{874}^{**}\)

    

(0.651)

(0.727)

(0.745)

(0.846)

Unemployment benefits (degression)

− 0.198

\({-1}.{098}^{**}\)

\({-1}.{283}^{**}\)

\({-1}.{588}^{**}\)

    

(0.454)

(0.504)

(0.539)

(0.707)

Employment protection (regular)

− 0.095

− 0.126

− 0.076

0.007

    

(0.156)

(0.145)

(0.155)

(0.199)

Employment protection (temporary)

0.042

− 0.130

− 0.140

− 0.155

    

(0.095)

(0.096)

(0.098)

(0.107)

Instrument for numeracy

numeracy

PISA

      

ages 16–19

math

\(R^2\, (\delta _0^c)\)

0.361

0.451

0.410

0.395

0.593

0.581

0.510

Observations

30

30

29

27

27

27

27

 

\(\lambda _i-\delta _i\) (log-risk-ratio of exiting to entering unemployment)

Numeracy (std)

\({1}.{969}^{***}\)

\({1}.{748}^{***}\)

\({2}.{170}^{***}\)

\({2}.{001}^{***}\)

\({2}.{249}^{***}\)

\({2}.{382}^{***}\)

\({2}.{425}^{***}\)

 

(0.409)

(0.399)

(0.449)

(0.442)

(0.397)

(0.513)

(0.863)

Logarithmized GDP per capita (PPP)

0.431

\({0}.{816}^{*}\)

\({0}.{862}^{**}\)

\({0}.{877}^{*}\)

  

(0.392)

  

(0.422)

(0.438)

(0.501)

Employment in public sector (share)

−1.804

\({-3}.{892}^{***}\)

\({-3}.{835}^{***}\)

\({-3}.{817}^{**}\)

  

(1.169)

  

(1.461)

(1.471)

(1.502)

ICT in the workplace (std)

0.440

\({1}.{041}^{*}\)

0.946

0.915

  

(0.504)

  

(0.612)

(0.655)

(0.824)

Minimum relative to median wage

0.869

\({3}.{068}^{**}\)

\({3}.{211}^{**}\)

\({3}.{257}^{**}\)

   

(1.465)

 

(1.267)

(1.317)

(1.517)

Trade union density

− 0.691

0.216

0.194

0.187

   

(0.624)

 

(0.591)

(0.594)

(0.606)

Unemployment benefits (level)

0.433

− 0.595

− 0.640

− 0.655

    

(0.752)

(0.741)

(0.751)

(0.789)

Unemployment benefits (degression)

0.327

\({1}.{326}^{***}\)

\({1}.{397}^{**}\)

\({1}.{420}^{**}\)

    

(0.525)

(0.514)

(0.543)

(0.659)

Employment protection (regular)

− 0.084

− 0.094

− 0.113

− 0.119

    

(0.180)

(0.148)

(0.156)

(0.186)

Employment protection (temporary)

− 0.107

0.123

0.127

0.128

    

(0.110)

(0.098)

(0.098)

(0.100)

Instrument for numeracy

numeracy

PISA

      

ages 16–19

math

\(R^2\, (\lambda _0^c-\delta _0^c)\)

0.485

0.624

0.512

0.613

0.797

0.796

0.795

Observations

30

30

29

27

27

27

27

  1. Sample restricted to survey participants ages 25–54 and excluding survey participants from Indonesia, Ecuador, Peru, Mexico, Kazakhstan, Chile and Turkey. Fixed effects by round of data collection not displayed. Set of covariates in specifications (3) and (5)–(7) additionally includes an indicator variable for countries without minimum-wage regulations. Sampling weights employed in all calculations. Standard errors in parentheses. Statistical significance at the 10, 5, and 1% level denoted by \(^{*}\), \(^{**}\), and \(^{***}\), respectively. Author’s calculations based on the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC), the Penn World Table 9.1 (Feenstra et al. 2015), OECD statistics (https://stats.oecd.org/) and ILO statistics (https://ilostat.ilo.org/data/)