Skip to main content

Table 7 Proportion of vendor–buyer interactions with unavailable stickers

From: Price discrimination in informal labor markets in Bogotá: an audit experiment during the 2018 FIFA World Cup

a Vendor did not have the sticker and did not give any price

  

Vendors

   

Stickers

 

COL-F-LL

ARG-M-LL

COL-M-SL

 

COL-F-LL

ARG-M-LL

COL-M-SL

Downtown

0/21

1/12

1/6

 

0/189

6/108

1/24

Street 72nd

0/13

0/10

0/13

 

0/117

0/90

0/52

Street 85th

0/9

1/9

1/7

 

0/81

8/81

1/28

Street 93rd

1/7

0/8

1/7

 

6/63

0/72

1/28

Street 147th

0/8

0/7

0/7

 

0/72

0/63

0/28

Total

1/58 = 1.72%

2/46 = 4.35%

3/40 = 7.5%

 

6/522 = 1.15%

14/414 = 3.38%

3/160 = 1.87%

b Vendor did not have the sticker but did mention a price

  

Vendors

   

Stickers

 

COL-F-LL

ARG-M-LL

COL-M-SL

 

COL-F-LL

ARG-M-LL

COL-M-SL

Downtown

0/21

1/12

1/6

 

0/189

4/108

1/24

Street 72nd

0/13

1/10

2/13

 

0/117

3/90

3/52

Street 85th

0/9

0/9

0/7

 

0/81

0/81

0/28

Street 93rd

1/7

1/8

1/7

 

3/63

6/72

1/28

Street 147th

1/8

0/7

0/7

 

1/72

0/63

0/28

Total

2/58 = 3.45%

3/46 = 6.52%

4/40 = 10%

 

4/522 = 0.77%

13/414 = 3.14%

5/160 = 3.12%

  1. Columns correspond to the three buyers who collected this information in detail. COL-F-LL refers to the Colombian woman in the Long List treatment. For the Long List, the number of missing values in bold font coincide with the number of missing values in the database for the experimenter. For the Short List, even though nine vendors did have the four stickers, they only mentioned the price for the full list, and not for each of them individually