Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary statistics of policy-style indicators

From: Training vouchers, local employment agencies, and policy stylesBildungsgutscheine, regionale Arbeitsagenturen und Politikstile

 

Mean

\(CAI> 0\)

\(CAI < 0\)

Diff.

Sdv.

Scaling

Assessment of reform activities regarding…

  

Further training in general

3.348

3.410

3.284

0.126

0.070

very negative (1) - very positive (5)

Demand forecast

3.245

3.274

3.215

0.059

0.076

very negative (1) - very positive (5)

Training vouchers

3.752

3.826

3.676

0.150

0.070

very negative (1) - very positive (5)

Transparency

3.104

3.132

3.077

0.055

0.078

very negative (1) - very positive (5)

Assessment indicator

3.362

3.411

3.313

0.098

0.053

 

Cooperation between training providers and employment agencies regarding…

  

Progress of courses

3.205

3.229

3.181

0.047

0.079

never (1) - always (5)

Problems during the course

3.649

3.678

3.619

0.058

0.074

never (1) - always (5)

No-appearance of participants

4.091

4.132

4.048

0.084

0.067

never (1) - always (5)

Cooperation indicator

3.648

3.680

3.616

0.063

0.062

 

Organization within employment agencies

  

Training regarding new quality systems

0.156

0.131

0.182

− 0.051

0.027

no (0) - yes (1)

Quality controls of courses

0.942

0.924

0.960

− 0.036

0.019

no (0) - yes (1)

Contact persons for problems or questions

0.818

0.817

0.820

− 0.003

0.031

no (0) - yes (1)

Organization indicator

0.639

0.624

0.654

− 0.030

0.017

 

Communication with other institutions involved

  

Federal Employment Agency

0.422

0.433

0.411

0.021

0.057

no (0) - yes (1)

Private certification bodies (regarding quality results)

0.857

0.917

0.794

0.124

0.039

no (0) - yes (1)

Training providers (managers only)

0.798

0.859

0.733

0,126

0,047

no (0) - yes (1)

Employers (managers only)

0.626

0.673

0.577

0,096

0,058

no (0) - yes (1)

Employers’ associations (managers only)

0.459

0.499

0.417

0,082

0,062

no (0) - yes (1)

Communication indicator

0.643

0.680

0.604

0.075

0.037

 

Communication indicator (managers only)

0.650

0.697

0.599

0.098

0.040

 

Single-case certification and training without vouchers

  

In favour of single-case certification (scc)

0.277

0.251

0.303

− 0.052

0.038

no (0) - yes (1)

In favour of training without vouchers

0.228

0.219

0.237

− 0.018

0.036

no (0) - yes (1)

In favour an increase in scc (managers only)

0.107

0.075

0.140

− 0.065

0.045

no (0) - yes (1)

Share of ssc (managers only)

0.297

0.272

0.325

− 0.053

0.073

dummy for share above the mean

Avoidance indicator

0.251

0.232

0.270

− 0.038

0.029

 

Avoidance indicator (managers only)

0.214

0.186

0.244

− 0.058

0.046

 

Caseworkers’ assessments regarding the suitability of training for different groups of persons

  

Job returner

0.971

0.977

0.965

0.012

0.025

dummy for positive assessment

Young people (aged up to 25)

0.632

0.591

0.674

− 0.084

0.073

dummy for positive assessment

Older people (aged over 55)

0.569

0.568

0.570

− 0.002

0.076

dummy for positive assessment

Without educational degree

0.316

0.330

0.302

0.027

0.071

dummy for positive assessment

Without vocational degree

0.948

0.977

0.919

0.059

0.033

dummy for positive assessment

Migration background

0.529

0.500

0.558

− 0.058

0,076

dummy for positive assessment

Health problems

0.529

0.568

0.488

0.080

0.076

dummy for positive assessment

Disability

0.764

0.739

0.791

− 0.052

0.065

dummy for positive assessment

Short-term unemployed

0.448

0.432

0.465

− 0.033

0.076

dummy for positive assessment

Long-term unemployed

0.575

0.568

0.581

− 0.013

0.075

dummy for positive assessment

Without practical experience

0.460

0.557

0.360

0.196

0.075

dummy for positive assessment

Important criteria for caseworkers when they award vouchers

  

Reintegration probability

0.954

0.955

0.953

0.001

0.032

dummy for important criteria

Profiling

0.989

0.977

1.000

− 0.023

0.016

dummy for important criteria

Biography

0.770

0.750

0.791

− 0.041

0.064

dummy for important criteria

Educational degree

0.954

0.966

0.942

0.024

0.032

dummy for important criteria

Vocational degree

0.983

0.977

0.988

− 0.011

0.020

dummy for important criteria

Search activity

0.764

0.750

0.779

− 0.029

0.065

dummy for important criteria

  1. Note: We aggregate the answers of all participating managers and caseworkers at employment agency levels. In columns 3 and 4 we show means for employment agencies with conditional award intensities (CAI) that are above and below average respectively.