Skip to main content

Table 4 Advancement of multi-year low-wage workers in 2000 and 2003; probit estimations with sample selection; marginal effects

From: Low-wage careers: Are there dead-end firms and dead-end jobs?Niedriglohnkarrieren: Werden bestimmte Betriebe oder Beschäftigungen zur Sackgasse?

Independent variables

All workers

Still full-time employed workers

 

2000

2003

2000

2003

Upward mobility equation

Female (1 \( = \) yes)

−0.053

−0.111

−0.059

−0.123

 

(0.006)

(0.009)

(0.007)

(0.013)

Age 15–24 (1 \( = \) yes)

0.062

0.140

0.055

0.209

 

(0.007)

(0.009)

(0.008)

(0.014)

Age 25–34 (1 \( = \) yes)

0.035

0.060

0.034

0.098

 

(0.005)

(0.006)

(0.005)

(0.010)

Age 50–57 (1 \( = \) yes)

−0.014

−0.065

−0.011

−0.062

 

(0.005)

(0.006)

(0.006)

(0.011)

School leaving certificate without vocational training (1 \( = \) yes)

−0.015

−0.028

−0.016

−0.040

 

(0.004)

(0.006)

(0.005)

(0.010)

High school certificate with vocational training (1 \( = \) yes)

0.038

0.033

0.050

0.063

 

(0.017)

(0.021)

(0.020)

(0.033)

University degree (1 \( = \) yes)

0.014

0.023

0.021

0.019

 

(0.021)

(0.028)

(0.025)

(0.042)

Education unknown (1 \( = \) yes)

0.002

−0.009

0.003

−0.017

 

(0.005)

(0.007)

(0.006)

(0.011)

Foreigner (1 \( = \) yes)

0.011

−0.021

0.016

0.004

 

(0.007)

(0.008)

(0.008)

(0.016)

Unskilled manual occupations (1 \( = \) yes)

−0.014

−0.033

−0.025

−0.056

 

(0.006)

(0.008)

(0.006)

(0.013)

Skilled manual occupations (1 \( = \) yes)

−0.016

−0.030

−0.026

−0.061

 

(0.005)

(0.008)

(0.006)

(0.012)

Unskilled services (1 \( = \) yes)

−0.024

−0.046

−0.035

−0.082

 

(0.005)

(0.007)

(0.005)

(0.011)

Skilled services (1 \( = \) yes)

−0.024

−0.031

−0.031

−0.050

 

(0.007)

(0.010)

(0.008)

(0.017)

Unskilled commercial and administrative occupations (1 \( = \) yes)

−0.018

−0.047

−0.028

−0.074

 

(0.005)

(0.007)

(0.005)

(0.011)

Semi-professions (1 \( = \) yes)

−0.004

−0.033

−0.003

−0.040

 

(0.012)

(0.014)

(0.013)

(0.024)

Occupation type unknown (1 \( = \) yes)

0.013

−0.017

−0.022

−0.029

 

(0.025)

(0.030)

(0.019)

(0.048)

21–100 employees (1 \( = \) yes)

0.013

0.010

0.011

0.014

 

(0.004)

(0.006)

(0.005)

(0.009)

101–500 employees (1 \( = \) yes)

0.021

0.023

0.022

0.049

 

(0.006)

(0.008)

(0.007)

(0.013)

More than 500 employees (1 \( = \) yes)

0.013

0.031

0.033

0.086

 

(0.010)

(0.014)

(0.014)

(0.025)

Percentage of women

−1.50E-04

−7.59E-05

3.09E-05

−1.60E-04

 

(−7.31E-05)

(1.05E-04)

(8.66E-05)

(1.74E-04)

Percentage of highly-qualified workers

−9.54E-05

−7.03E-05

−6.02E-05

1.43E-04

 

(1.30E-04)

(1.84E-04)

(1.50E-04)

(3.08E-04)

Percentage of workers aged 15–24

3.21E-04

2.90E-04

2.99E-04

1.85E-04

 

(1.12E-04)

(1.56E-04)

(1.33E-04)

(2.55E-04)

Percentage of workers aged 25–34

1.61E-04

1.14E-04

2.25E-04

6.44E-06

 

(1.07E-04)

(1.47E-04)

(1.24E-04)

(2.35E-04)

Percentage of workers older than 49

−1.21E-04

−6.63E-05

−5.49E-07

−1.42E-04

 

(1.26E-04)

(1.69E-04)

(1.46E-04)

(2.70E-04)

Percentage of low-wage workers

−3.25E-04

−6.53E-04

−5.94E-04

−1.23E-03

 

(9.07E-05)

(1.18E-04)

(9.30E-05)

(1.86E04)

Percentage of foreign workers

−7.97E-05

2.63E-04

−6.22E-05

5.06E-04

 

1.11E-04

(1.57E-04)

(1.34E-04)

(2.59E-04)

Plant located in eastern Germany (1 \( = \) yes)

−0.006

−0.006

0.001

−0.014

 

(0.004)

(0.006)

(0.005)

(0.009)

Change of plants (1 \( = \) yes)

0.134

0.188

   

(0.005)

(0.008)

Change of occupation type (1 \( = \) yes)

0.050

0.093

   

(0.009)

(0.011)

Number of observations

26,589

26,589

21,858

16,181

Selection equation

Regional unemployment rate in June 1997

0.003

0.003

0.001

0.001

 

(0.001)

(0.001)

(0.001)

(0.001)

Low-wage employment in 1997 (1 \( = \) yes)

0.576

0.578

0.553

0.434

 

(0.004)

(0.004)

(0.004)

(0.004)

Years of work experience between 1993–1997

−0.083

−0.084

−0.075

−0.062

 

(0.001)

(0.001)

(0.002)

(0.002)

Part-time/marginal employed in 1997 (1 \( = \) yes)

0.185

0.188

0.276

0.309

 

(0.004)

(0.004)

(0.006)

(0.010)

Number of observations

237,278

237,278

237,278

237,278

ρ (correlation of the error terms)

0.159

0.0731

0.187

0.163

Significance of model

χ2 (42) \( = \) 663.2

χ2 (42) \( = \) 1232.8

χ2 (44) \( = \) 1726.1

χ2 (44) \( = \) 1954.1

Joint significance of variable groups

Age, level of education, type of occupation, firm size, age composition of workers in the firm, industry

Age, level of education, type of occupation, firm size, age composition of workers in the firm n.s., industry

Age, level of education, type of occupation, firm size, age composition of workers in the firm, industry

Age, level of education, type of occupation, firm size, age composition of workers in the firm n.s., industry

  1. Notes: own calculations based on BAP. Marginal effects calculated at the sample mean. Heteroscedasticity-consistent standard errors in parentheses (clustered at plant level). 16 industry dummies suppressed in the table. Reference categories of dummy variable groups: age 35–49, secondary school certificate with vocational training, skilled commercial and administrative occupations, 1–20 employees, percentage of workers aged 35–49. Significance levels: p < 0.1; p < 0.05; p < 0.01; n.s. denotes statistical insignificance. The selection equation contains all variables from the upward mobility equation, except change of plant and change of occupation type.