Table 3 Estimates of focus variables in robustness checks
From: Labor market tightness and individual wage growth: evidence from Germany
Model | Row | \(ue\)-ratio | \(\Delta\) \(ue\)-ratio | No. Obs | Adj. R2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b | (s.e.) | b | (s.e.) | ||||
Baseline | (1) | − 0.250 | (0.015) | − 0.120 | (0.012) | 316,711 | 0.591 |
Men only | (2) | − 0.305 | (0.017) | − 0.132 | (0.014) | 177,008 | 0.562 |
Women only | (3) | − 0.116 | (0.035) | − 0.170 | (0.046) | 139,703 | 0.555 |
Educational degree | (4) | − 0.262 | (0.016) | − 0.127 | (0.012) | 275,342 | 0.587 |
No University option | (5) | − 0.238 | (0.017) | − 0.118 | (0.012) | 224,050 | 0.582 |
No regional migration | (6) | − 0.206 | (0.019) | − 0.089 | (0.012) | 216,985 | 0.603 |
No migr., no STEM change | (7) | − 0.194 | (0.020) | − 0.095 | (0.014) | 198,176 | 0.604 |
no STEM change | (8) | − 0.238 | (0.016) | − 0.122 | (0.014) | 285,613 | 0.592 |
No reg. and no occ. Migr | (9) | − 0.189 | (0.022) | − 0.148 | (0.020) | 124,752 | 0.594 |
Only one employer | (10) | − 0.008 | (0.018) | − 0.055 | (0.009) | 316,711 | 0.636 |
Average firm wage | (11) | − 0.170 | (0.028) | − 0.122 | (0.018) | 256,233 | 0.602 |
CHK effects | (12) | − 0.143 | (0.025) | − 0.097 | (0.029) | 71,025 | 0.609 |