On the effectiveness of case management for people with disabilities

Journal for Labour Market Research

Table 10 Separate heterogeneous effects using propensity score matching for different income quartiles

	Income Q1 Below 48.1	Income Q2 48.1 to 63.7	Income Q3 63.7 to 79.95	Income Q4 Above 79.95
Total difference	0.131 (0.086)	− 0.056 (0.054)	0.102** (0.048)	0.175*** (0.038)
Difference due to characteristics	− 0.066*** (0.025)	0.011 (0.018)	0.016 (0.015)	0.076*** (0.012)
Difference due to coefficients	0.197** (0.084)	− 0.067 (0.058)	0.087* (0.050)	0.099** (0.040)
Observations	3638	3561	3561	3619

Note: Some of the observations are on the threshold and therefore the number of observations is not equal in the different quartiles
Bootstrapped standard errors, based on 10′000 replications, in parentheses
^*** Indicates significance at the 1% level
^** Indicates significance at the 5% level
^* Indicates significance at the 10% level