Skip to main content

Table 6 The effects of the 2013 PES reform: difference-in-differences regression coefficients, alternative specifications (dependent variable: unemployment duration)

From: Effects of face-to-face counselling on unemployment rate and duration: evidence from a Public Employment Service reform

Independent variable

(1) Time period 2012–2014

(2) Time period 2012–2015

(3) Time period 2012–2016

(4) Time period 2012–2017

Treated municipality

1.236 (0.646)

2.264** (0.851)

3.221** (1.110)

2.494* (1.193)

Lapland region

5.631*** (0.970)

6.230*** (1.050)

5.693*** (1.457)

3.690** (1.348)

Long-term unemployed pilot project in 2012–2015

−0.792 (0.655)

−1.155 (0.835)

−1.228 (1.094)

−1.508 (1.194)

Recipient of mass layoff support in 2013–15

0.425 (0.949)

0.093 (1.023)

  

Recipient of mass layoff support in 2015

 

1.950 (2.212)

  

Recipient of mass layoff support in 2016–17

  

1.984 (2.653)

3.888 (2.107)

PES office closure in 2016–17

  

0.401 (1.368)

0.033 (1.376)

Constant

4.164*** (0.440)

7.093*** (0.518)

10.478*** (0.691)

11.568*** (0.742)

N

303

303

304

304

R-sq

0.082

0.090

0.060

0.037

  1. Dependent variable: unemployment duration (weeks)
  2. All equations are estimated with two years of data, i.e. the first and the last year of each period. Heteroscedasticity-robust standard errors in parentheses. Statistical significance is denoted as: *p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001