How does being out at work relate to discrimination and unemployment of gays and lesbians?

Fric, Karel

doi:10.1186/s12651-019-0264-1

Journal for Labour Market Research

Table 4 Results of the logistic regression models with dependent variables unemployment and reporting

From: How does being out at work relate to discrimination and unemployment of gays and lesbians?

Dependent variable	Unemployment			Reporting
Model	Base	Countries	Interactions	Base	Countries	Interactions
n	34,191	34,406	34,191	5582	5523	5582
Pseudo R²	0.0692	0.0775	0.07	0.073	0.093	0.075

Independent variables	Coeff.	Std.Err.	Coeff.	Std.Err.	Coeff.	Std.Err.	Coeff.	Std.Err.	Coeff.	Std.Err.	Coeff.	Std.Err.
concealment	0.847	0.496	0.992*	0.5	1.657	1.189	− 2.82***	0.208	− 2.698	0.21	− 3.761***	0.558
concealment²	− 0.641	0.441	− 0.747	0.444	− 0.662	1.05
homonegativity	0.624***	0.117	0.629***	0.117	0.336	0.259	− 0.595**	0.197	− 0.531	0.2	− 1.024*	0.499
percdiscr	0.414***	0.098	0.446***	0.098	0.62**	0.218	2.857***	0.4	2.932	0.403	2.864**	1.022
Gay male	− 0.014	0.062	0.027	0.066	0.42	0.337	0.221*	0.107	0.172	0.115	0.737	0.934
Gay male × conceal.					− 0.998	1.307					1.114	0.602
Gay male × conceal.²					0.04	1.157
Gay male × homoneg.					0.369	0.288					0.496	0.543
Gay male × percdiscr					− 0.258	0.244					0.031	1.11
discrprev	0.398***	0.107	− 0.553	0.458	0.408***	0.108	0.027	0.241	1.517	1.102	1.129	0.666
unemp. rate	0.077***	0.004			0.077***	0.004
legislation							− 0.482*	0.193			0.308	0.435
Gay male × discrprev											− 1.371	0.716
Gay male × legislation											− 1.028*	0.486
Age
30–49 years	− 0.698***	0.051	− 0.714***	0.051	− 0.694***	0.051
50+ years	− 0.776***	0.103	− 0.826***	0.103	− 0.772***	0.103
Education
Secondary	− 0.777***	0.159	− 0.658***	0.161	− 0.785***	0.159
Post-secondary	− 0.953***	0.162	− 0.962***	0.163	− 0.96***	0.162
College or higher	− 1.282***	0.156	− 1.229***	0.157	− 1.288***	0.156
Country
Austria			− 0.31	0.258					− 0.528	0.401
Bulgaria			0.498	0.397					− 1.761	0.942
Croatia			0.985*	0.412					− 1.635	0.952
Cyprus			1.058*	0.508					dropped
Czechia			− 0.327	0.226					− 2.079	0.748
Denmark			0.419	0.225					− 0.846	0.497
Estonia			− 1.884	1.023					− 1.997	1.097
Finland			− 0.145	0.22					− 0.652	0.351
France			0.482*	0.21					− 0.356	0.39
Germany			− 0.441*	0.176					− 0.821	0.277
Greece			1.686***	0.292					− 1.775	0.685
Hungary			0.843**	0.318					− 1.74	0.738
Ireland			0.219	0.237					− 0.937	0.405
Italy			0.895**	0.304					− 0.681	0.665
Latvia			− 0.415	0.517					− 1.261	0.832
Lithuania			0.23	0.465					− 2.946	1.316
Luxembourg			− 0.711	0.604					− 0.849	0.793
Malta			0.02	0.479					0.209	0.674
Netherlands			0.096	0.206					0.175	0.303
Poland			0.315	0.356					− 1.497	0.772
Portugal			1.262***	0.266					− 0.723	0.568
Romania			0.416	0.42					− 1.021	0.87
Slovakia			0.356	0.331					− 1.613	0.783
Slovenia			0.2	0.405					dropped
Spain			1.223***	0.159					− 0.729	0.28
Sweden			0.08	0.227					− 0.527	0.363
United Kingdom			− 0.018	0.177					− 0.086	0.234
Constant	− 2.866***	0.207	− 2.056***	0.26	− 3.222***	0.348	− 2.07***	0.346	− 2.504	0.414	− 2.443**	0.853

Start sign * means that the coefficient is statistically significant at 5%, ** at 1% and *** at 0.1%. Reference categories are 18–29 years (age), Primary education or lower (education) and Belgium (country). In the models with dependent variable reporting, Cyprus and Slovenia were dropped from the analysis because of insufficient variation in their cases. The sample size in LRM is reduced as compared to SEM due to listwise deletion

Back to article page