| |
Non routine occupations
|
Routine occupations
|
|---|
|
Total
|
Between
|
Within
|
Total
|
Between
|
Within
|
|---|
|
(A) Routine classification based on Acemoglu and Autor (2011)
|
|
Bottom
|
4.2
|
− 4.6
|
8.8
|
− 0.7
|
− 4.3
|
3.6
|
|
Middle
|
2.6
|
1.6
|
1.0
|
− 21.8
|
− 8.8
|
− 13.0
|
|
Top
|
16.6
|
16.3
|
0.3
|
− 0.8
|
− 0.1
|
− 0.7
|
|
All
| | | |
− 23.4
|
− 13.2
|
− 10.1
|
|
(B) Routine classification based on RTI index from Goos et al. (2014)—top 30%
|
|
Bottom
|
6.1
|
− 6.9
|
12.9
|
− 1.6
|
− 1.1
|
− 0.4
|
|
Middle
|
− 7.9
|
− 2.9
|
− 4.9
|
− 11.5
|
− 1.4
|
− 10.1
|
|
Top
|
14.9
|
12.3
|
2.6
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
|
All
| | | |
− 12.7
|
− 3.4
|
− 9.3
|
|
(C) Routine classification based on RTI index from Akçomak et al. (2016)—top 30%a
|
|
Bottom
|
6.5
|
− 4.2
|
10.7
|
− 3.0
|
− 4.7
|
1.7
|
|
Middle
|
− 6.7
|
− 1.5
|
− 5.1
|
− 12.6
|
− 5.7
|
− 6.9
|
|
Top
|
15.9
|
16.2
|
− 0.3
|
− 0.1
|
0.0
|
− 0.1
|
|
All
| | | |
− 15.7
|
− 10.5
|
− 5.3
|
- Results from a shift-share analysis with 48 groups: 4 education groups, 3 age groups, gender, immigration status. Details on the routine classifications are provided in Sect. 6 and Additional file 1: Appendix S4
- The discrepancies between the totals in Panel B and the other two panels is due to the fact that the RTI index from Goos et al. (2014) is only available for 21 ISCO 88 codes
- aDue to the size of the underlying occupations, the actual initial share of routine occupations here is 40% as shown in Table 3
