Skip to main content

Table 1 Regression coefficients for female and percentage of the gender income gap explained with alternate models, including background, values, education, family formation, and work factors

From: The gender income gap and the role of family formation revisitedEin zweiter Blick auf die Bedeutung der Familiengründung für das Zustandekommen geschlechtsspezifischer Einkommensungleichheit

  

Bobbitt-Zeher

Replication 1A:

pure replication

Replication 1B:

replication on unrestricted sample

Replication 1C:

replication on unrestricted sample with correction for misspecification

N = 1946

N = 1924

N = 3290

N = 3290

Model number

Model description

Income gap (bfemale)

% of gap explained

∆ (%)

Income gap (bfemale)

% of gap explained

∆ (%)

Income gap (bfemale)

% of gap explained

∆ (%)

Income gap (bfemale)

% of gap explained

∆ (%)

1

Female

−6938

−6670

0

−5707

0

−5707

0

2

Female and background

−6643

4

4

−6373

4

4

−5496

4

4

−5496

4

4

3

Female, background, and values

−6166

11

7

−5849

12

8

−4595

19

16

−4595

19

16

4

Female, background, values, and education

−3903

44

33

−3849

42

30

−2681

53

34

−2681

53

34

5

Female, background, values, education, and family formation (not interacted with gender)

−3854

44

0

−3789

43

1

−2771

51

−2

5b

Female, background, values, education, and family formation (interacted with gender)

−1813

68

15

6

Female, background, values, education, family formation, and work

−2132

69

25

−2569

61

18

−1460

74

23

−1050

82

13

  1. Sources: Bobbitt-Zeher (2007, p. 13); NELS:88, own (weighted) estimates.
  2.  change in percentage explained relative to previous model