Skip to main content

Table 5 Baseline specifications of the neoclassical migration model for German spatial planning regions

From: Testing the neoclassical migration model: overall and age-group specific results for German regionsTests zur Validität des neoklassischen Migrationsmodells: Allgemeine und altersgruppenspezifische Resultate für deutsche Raumordnungsregionen

Dep. var.: \( { nm_{ij,t} } \)

POLS

POLS

POLS

REM

FEM

FEMc

AB-GMM

SYS-GMM

\( { nm_{ij,t-1} } \)

0.90

0.90

0.78

0.92

0.84

0.88

 

(0.011)

(0.011)

(0.022)

(0.031)

(0.001)

(0.001)

\( { u_{i,t-1} } \)

−0.74

 

(0.114)

\( { u_{j,t-1} } \)

0.64

 

(0.399)

\( { \tilde{u}_{ij,t-1} } \)

−0.72

−0.05

−0.05

−0.32

−0.28

−0.53

−0.19

 

(0.114)

(0.041)

(0.041)

(0.166)

(0.166)

(0.023)

(0.006)

\( { y_{i,t-1} } \)

0.07

 

(0.315)

\( { y_{j,t-1} } \)

−0.14

 

(0.378)

\( { \tilde{y}_{ij,t-1} } \)

0.07

0.12

0.12

−0.26

−0.10

0.25

0.03

 

(0.314)

(0.108)

(0.112)

(0.372)

(0.374)

(0.066)

(0.014)

No. of obs.

1067

1067

1067

1067

1067

1067

1067

1067

No. of groups

97

97

97

97

97

97

97

97

No. of years

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

\( { \beta_{u_{i}} = -\beta_{u_{j}} } \)

(0.83)

(0.60)

(0.42)

(0.11)

(0.19)

(0.00)

(0.14)

\( { \beta_{y_{i}} = -\beta_{y_{j}} } \)

(0.76)

(0.60)

(0.24)

(0.39)

(0.59)

(0.58)

(0.14)

\( { m_1 } \) and \( { m_2 } \)

(0.42)/(0.24)

(0.35)/(0.24)

J-stat. overall

Passed

Passed

C-stat. LEV-EQ

Passed

Time dummies (11)

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Relative RMSE

1

1.07

0.38

0.38

0.41

0.39

0.43

0.38

  1. Note:, , \( { = } \) denote significance levels at the 1, 5 and 10% level, respectively. Standard Errors in brackets.